Thursday, October 6, 2016

Excellence In Innovation - Morehouse Instrument Company 2016 Finalist

Morehouse Instrument Company was honored to be selected as a finalist for Excellence In Innovation.

Excellence In Innovation - A culture of innovation is necessary to seize greater opportunities in the global economy.   Finalist were selected for having a strong record and solid reputation for developing new products, adopting new technologies, and improving manufacturing processes leading to customer retention and expansion into new markets.

Morehouse is excited to be nominated for this award and has just started to really innovate.   We believe in our people and feel very privileged to have such an excellent staff, as well as some of the best customers, a company could possibly hope for.  

We have just started on a long continuous improvement journey to provide our customers the best possible service, we can offer.   Morehouse welcomes the future, and looks forward to announcing some new products, and service upgrades soon.


written by Henry Zumbrun

Saturday, October 1, 2016

AC Versus DC (mV/V) Differences in Load Cell Meters Using a Load Cell Simulator

There is a difference in output from Alternating Current (AC) measurements and Direct Current (DC).  To show the difference, we used a load cell simulator on two different meters.   We used a simulator that was tested at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (N.I.S.T) as the reference.  This simulator was utilized to accurately replicate the excitation and output response of a load cell when connected to the meters in the experiments.  On the DC meter side, a Fluke 8505A Reference Multimeter was used, and on the AC side, a HBM DMP40 Precision Measuring Instrument was used.   The differences between the simulator set point value and measure values by the meters are reported in the table below. In this table, the first column represents the set point values.

Note: If we wanted to standardize a Morehouse 4215, or Morehouse DSC meter, we would use the N.I.S.T. values.  At -3.00000 mV/V we would enter -3.00010 as we want to standardize the meter to repeat the N.I.S.T. value of -3.00010 when -3.00000 set point, is selected.
Looking at the test data above, it appears the difference between AC and DC mV/V can be quantified between these two very high end meters and the difference is about 0.003 %. As depicted in the chart below, the DC meter output consistently involved higher differences when compared to the AC meter. 

The importance of this blog is to show an AC meter cannot be interchanged with a DC meter as the difference between AC and DC measurements, is most likely not linear.   If a lab is using a DC or AC meter as a reference, the measurement traceability can only be derived from the type of current used by the reference lab.  AC and DC meters are not interchangeable and one cannot be substituted in lieu of another one without requiring calibration of the entire system.

Note: This blog is comparing two very different meters and does not represent what is likely to happen in all AC versus DC comparisons.  The point of this blog is to demonstrate that any indicator being substituted may need to be thoroughly tested to know the additional contribution to measurement uncertainty and that AC meters may produce entirely different results than DC meters.    

written by Henry Zumbrun

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

Battery life and voltage may impact your calibration results

It is becoming more and more common to have portable devices that use batteries.   This can be a great benefit to someone who wants ultimate portability.   However, this portability can come with additional errors, if the portable device is not a true ratio metric device, or if the batteries voltages discharge below the allowable operating range. In such cases, the output of a force measuring device may change based upon the batteries conditions. Knowing these issues may exist, Morehouse decided to do some testing on a Crane Scale submitted for calibration (Figure 1) ...   

Figure 1: 250K Crane Scale being calibrated in our 5 MN UCM

A 250,000 lbf crane scale was submitted to Morehouse laboratory for calibration along with a handheld load indicator.   The meter uses three AA batteries and for this test, we chose not to calibrate with a new set of batteries.   We decided to do the calibration exactly how it was submitted to the laboratory for calibration.   We exercised the crane scale and recorded the "As Received" calibration values (Figure 2).    We did not move the device from the original position and simply replaced the batteries with new ones.   The test was repeated and the second set of data is displayed  in the "As Returned" column in Figure 2.  

Figure 2: Calibration Results

As Figure 2 indicates, we observed a 700 lbf difference at the maximum capacity point.   This equated to a 0.28 % difference in load reading when the batteries were replaced with new ones.   The issue was that the device submitted for calibration had a tolerance of +/- 0.1 % of Full Scale or +/- 250 lbf.  The Morehouse Calibration and Measurement Capability (CMC) for this test was  59 lbf (This includes contributions from the expanded uncertainty of our system of 13 lbf and the resolution of the UUT which was 100 lbf).    For the end user, there would not be a good way to determine when the device went out of tolerance as these numbers clearly show the device to be "In Tolerance" with a new set of batteries.   Chances are the device will stay "In Tolerance", until the batteries discharge to a certain point over time.    The problem is, it is very difficult to know the exact voltage level where this will happen and the device will once again go out of tolerance.     Monitoring this effect could be very difficult for the end user as frequent testing of the battery voltage may not be practical, nor may be replacing the batteries after several hours of use.   This problem is clearly one the end user will have to deal with.    Luckily, not all portable devices have these issues.  There are several portable instruments that maintain accuracy specification, display a low battery warning, or will cease to operate when voltage is lower than the predetermined range.    

In an effort to produce more confidence in our measurements, Morehouse has adopted a new policy to calibrate instruments with a new set of fully charged batteries.  These batteries are shipped back with your instruments, as well as any batteries provided.    Most instruments will operate fine with a lesser charge; the word “most” is what concerns us.   The Morehouse mission is to be regarded as the best independent force calibration resource in the world.  In keeping with our mission, Morehouse provides a new set of batteries to ensure we can provide meaningful measurement results with the lowest uncertainties possible.   

Figure 3: Charge Levels of Batteries
Remember, confidence in your test and measurement results starts with your calibration provider.

We will be running an additional blog post on effects of 5 Volt versus 10 Volt excitation voltage as well as post on AC versus DC meters before years end.

Written by Henry Zumbrun

Sunday, August 21, 2016

Load Cell Alignment Plugs Proper Use

Morehouse load cell alignment plugs are used to help center the load cell in calibrating machines. They are used in combination with the other adapters below.   More information on load cell adapters and the mounting accessories can be found here.

Morehouse Reference Standard Mounting Kits for Universal Calibrating Machines

Thread is past flush and into the cell.  

When using your alignment plugs that thread into the bottom of your load cells, make sure they are threaded flush to the bottom of the cell.  Once they are flush, thread the adapter an extra turn into the cell.  You want to make sure that none of the threads are exposed below the base of the cell.   If there is a thread or more exposed, the load will be generated through the internal threads of the cell and not its base.  This will result in an additional calibration error of about 0.012 %.  It will often result in damage to the alignment plug.

Alignment plug is not threaded past the base of the cell.

Written by Henry Zumbrun with help from the calibration lab technicians,  who have received numerous load cells with damaged alignment plugs.

Monday, August 1, 2016

How to Lose a lot of Money on Annual Load Cell Calibrations

Purchasing the "right" load cell system is critical for the application, and obtaining reliable results. Purchasing a system merely based on cost and not looking at the right specifications may result in a complete waste of capital. If the system chosen does not perform well in the environment it is being used, the resulting measurements may not be meaningful.   

Questions to ask when purchasing a load cell system:

·  Does it meet my mechanical and environmental requirements?
·  What is the cost?
·  How easy is it to use?
·  How accurate is it? 

Morehouse load cell systems consists of  one or more Morehouse load cells, a digital indicator, a cable, possible adapters and a quality shipping case with custom cut high density foam.

When a buyer evaluates a system based on meeting requirements such as:  cost, ease of use and accuracy, they often forget to look at what really matters. Buyers often get caught in marketing claims and overlook the fine print. Things that are commonly missed are environmental, side load sensitivity and stability. All of these can have a significant impact on the load cells performance and make the original accuracy claim, you know the one you read in the marketing literature, false! If the load cell is not temperature compensated, the expected performance may decrease by about 0.015 % per degree C, resulting in a decrease in accuracy. In fact, a few degrees C deviation from the calibration temperature may cause more error than the originally stated accuracy in the specs sheet.  

Side load sensitivity (eccentric loading) may have the most significant impact on the expected performance of the system. Morehouse has done several tests and demonstrated side load sensitivity can vary from 0.002 % on a Morehouse load cell system up to 0.75 % of full scale on some other load cells. Depending on the load cell application and mechanical design of the system, off-center loading can simply happen even if all loading points and adapters seem to be in line. If you are buying a load cell with a 0.5 % accuracy specification, do you think it is really accurate when the slightest bit of off-center loading, produces a 0.75 % error?  

The final specification, often neglected is stability. Stability will have a significant impact on your cost of ownership. If the system is not stable, it will require more frequent calibration. More frequent calibration means higher lifetime cost of ownership. It is not uncommon to compare a $ 1500.00 system with a $ 3,000.00 system and have the lifetime cost of ownership end up being closer to $ 10,000.00 versus $ 5000.00.   

The only way to address these issues is to educate the customers. In an effort to educate the end buyer, we have developed videos, training classes, webinar and often do several speaking engagements per year. The videos and training material can be found on our website Inform the buyer on what matters by educating them. Have them start asking, how well does it actually accomplish the measurement for my application? Try to persuade the buyer to purchase based on overall value and not the upfront cost alone.         

Written by Henry Zumbrun


Thursday, July 14, 2016



            To help avoid situations that may cause personal injury or equipment damage when using Load Cells, Proving Rings, Force Gauges and other types of instruments to which forces are applied, this post was created.  Our goal is to help anyone making force measurements, be safe and keep their equipment functioning properly.  These are common mistakes  and there are several more not covered in this post. In the future, we hope to continue this series of posts for both force and torque measurement safety tips.   

When loading thru a steel ball, the instrument should have a conical ball seat of the recommended size (see figure 2 below), for the size of ball being used and the opposing surface should have a similar ball seat.  Alternately, a soft steel pad of sufficient size and thickness may be used in place of a ball seat in the opposite surface for capacities of 200,000 lbs and less.  The force must be applied axially within one degree.  The bottom boss of the load cell or other instrument must bear against a flat hardened steel surface, and if possible, should be restrained.  See figure 1 above.

When loading a load cell or other force measuring instrument thru a steel ball, be certain that the ball is made of hardened chrome alloy steel, and that it is the recommended size (see figure 2) to withstand the force applied.  Never use a carbide ball... carbide is brittle and will shatter under load

Do not load between unstable surfaces.  Under load, the instrument could be spewed from the machine with tremendous force.  Never use a set-up where there are two spherical surfaces opposing another without making the appropriate adapters to contain the instrument.  Morehouse has developed special adapters for this type of loading.  Without the appropriate adapters the instrument could be thrown from the machine with tremendous force.   See figure 3 above for an example of what not to do.

Do not load between two steel balls unless the loading components are mechanically restrained to prevent any possible lateral movement when loaded.  Additionally, the surfaces of the components must have properly sized ball seats, the ball seats of the components must be axially aligned, and ball retainer clips should be used.  See figure 4 

When using tension member assemblies having mating spherical surfaces, be certain that they are properly installed. See figure 5.  Morehouse Quick Change Tension members (pictured below) are designed to help eliminate eccentric loads, resulting in a more accurate and safer force application.

Morehouse UCM with Load Cell in Tension using Quick Change Tension Members

Do not load between surfaces that exceed one degree deviation from parallel.  See figure 6 below.

MOST IMPORTANT...Any adapter or accessory you may design, make or purchase for use with a calibrating or force measuring instrument must be of proper design and made from steel of the proper strength to withstand the forces to which it is subjected.  It is most important that adapters and accessories be test loaded under safe conditions prior to actual use with an instrument.  Equipment should not be used beyond its maximum rated capacity.  Failure to use the proper strength material may result in serious injury or death.

Read and understand all instructions and precautions applicable to the use of the instrument and/or machines being used to apply the force.

If there are questions or doubts at any time about the use of Load Cells, Proving Rings or other force measuring instruments, contact us by telephone 717-843-0081 or email:

written by Henry Zumbrun

Saturday, July 2, 2016

Load Cell Measurement Error - Top Block Adapter Hardness and Flatness

Can a load cell adapter plate or block be interchanged without introducing additional error?  

This blog will attempt to answer this question.   The answer is maybe.   If the new adapter consists of the same material and has identical characteristics, then it may be able to be substituted, without introducing additional error.   Though, some material will harden with repeated use and there could be a difference.    It is important the material of the top block be softer, has a lower hardness, than the load cell it is used with.  If a top block is replaced, the recommendation is to have the force measuring equipment checked, or calibrated to ensure errors are accounted for.   

·         Using a top adapter with a different hardness value may affect the strain level in the load cell column or web; and therefore, result in different measurement outputs.  We have observed errors of up to 0.15 % from varying the material on top compression pads.  We highly recommend the end user send us the top adapter they are using with the load cell, and even load cell bases.  If either adapter is not ground flat, additional errors could result.   We have conducted several tests and have found repeatability errors to be about 3 times higher, when the compression pads or load cell base is not flat. Morehouse has a full machine shop and can grind top adapters for a nominal fee (typically $30 to $40 per block).

Real World Example:  A customer brought in a 1,000,000 LBF load cell for calibration.   Morehouse performed a calibration.  The output of the load cell was recorded as 1,500 LBF higher than the previous calibration for a force applied 1,000,000 LBF. 

Is this a stability issue, or an adaptor issue?  

After calling the customer, we were informed a new top loading block was supplied with this load cell for the current calibration.   When we told them what was happening, they sent the original top loading block.  When tested, the original block resulted in an output of 1,000,180 LBF when loaded to 1,000,000 LBF.

When using the new adaptor and figuring the measurement error between the different top blocks (adaptors), Expanded Uncertainty would have increased from 269 LBF with original top adaptor to  1,490 LBF using the newly fabricated adaptor.   The individual contribution to the overall measurement uncertainty was dominant.    More information on this error and other common measurement errors, can be downloaded here.

written by Henry Zumbrun